Sales & Conversion

How I Learned Why Most SaaS Companies Get Billing Models Wrong (And What Actually Works)


Personas

SaaS & Startup

Time to ROI

Medium-term (3-6 months)

Here's something that frustrated the hell out of me when I was working with SaaS clients: they'd spend months perfecting their product, nail their onboarding, get users engaged - and then completely screw up their billing model.

I watched one client lose 40% of their potential revenue because they picked the wrong pricing strategy. Another one alienated their best customers by switching models mid-stream without understanding the implications.

The thing is, most SaaS founders treat billing like an afterthought. They copy what Slack or Stripe does without understanding why those models work for those specific businesses. But here's what I learned after working with dozens of SaaS companies: your billing model isn't just about collecting money - it's a core part of your product strategy.

Through trial and error (mostly error), I discovered that the most successful SaaS companies don't choose between subscription and usage billing. They understand when and how to combine both approaches strategically.

In this playbook, you'll learn:

  • Why the subscription vs usage debate is the wrong question to ask

  • The hidden psychological triggers that make hybrid billing models work

  • A framework for choosing the right billing mix for your specific business

  • Real implementation strategies that avoid the common pitfalls

  • How to transition existing customers without causing a revolt

Let me share what I learned from both the wins and the disasters, so you can get this right the first time. Check out more pricing strategies in our SaaS playbooks.

Industry Reality

What every SaaS founder gets told about billing

Walk into any SaaS conference or scroll through any pricing guide, and you'll hear the same tired advice about billing models. It's like everyone's reading from the same playbook - and honestly, it's mostly wrong for most businesses.

The conventional wisdom says:

  • Choose subscription for predictable revenue: Everyone quotes Netflix and Spotify as proof that monthly recurring revenue is the holy grail

  • Usage-based is better for fairness: The "pay for what you use" model seems more ethical and scales with customer success

  • Pick one and stick with it: Hybrid models are supposedly too complicated for customers to understand

  • Enterprise wants usage, SMBs want subscriptions: This oversimplified segmentation ignores actual customer behavior

  • Billing model doesn't affect product decisions: As if how you charge has nothing to do with how customers use your product

This advice exists because it's easy to understand and implement. Consultants love simple frameworks they can sell, and founders love clear-cut decisions that don't require deep thinking about their specific market.

But here's where it falls apart: these generic recommendations ignore the psychological and behavioral realities of how different customer segments actually make purchasing decisions. They treat billing like a technical implementation detail instead of what it really is - a core part of your product experience.

The result? Most SaaS companies either leave money on the table with overly simple models, or they alienate customers by choosing the wrong approach entirely. There's a better way, and it starts with understanding that billing strategy should follow customer psychology, not industry conventions.

Who am I

Consider me as your business complice.

7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS and Ecommerce brands.

Let me be blunt: the idea that you have to choose between subscription and usage billing is complete nonsense. It's like saying you have to choose between having a front door or windows on your house.

I realized this when working with different types of SaaS businesses. The companies that struggled most were the ones trying to force their diverse customer base into a single billing model. Meanwhile, the ones that thrived? They understood that different customer segments have different relationships with value and risk.

Here's what I observed across multiple client projects:

The subscription-only crowd missed massive revenue opportunities from their power users. I watched one analytics SaaS leave hundreds of thousands on the table because their enterprise customers would gladly pay 10x more for heavy usage, but the flat monthly fee capped their spend.

The usage-only folks scared away smaller customers who couldn't predict their bills. One API company I worked with had a 60% trial-to-paid conversion rate - until they switched to pure usage pricing. Overnight, it dropped to 20% because startups couldn't budget for unpredictable costs.

But the companies that combined both approaches? They captured the best of both worlds. Subscription provides the psychological safety net customers crave, while usage billing captures the economic value for power users.

Think about how Stripe does it - they don't make you choose between subscription and usage. They have both, seamlessly integrated. Or look at AWS - base services with usage-based scaling. These aren't accidents; they're strategic decisions based on customer psychology.

The breakthrough moment for me was realizing that billing models aren't just about revenue optimization - they're about risk management for both you and your customers. Some customers want predictability (subscription). Others want to pay only for what they use (usage). Why force them to choose?

My experiments

Here's my playbook

What I ended up doing and the results.

OK, so here's how I learned to implement hybrid billing without creating a pricing nightmare. This isn't theoretical - this is the exact framework I developed after helping multiple SaaS companies navigate this transition.

Step 1: Map Your Customer Value Patterns

First, you need to understand how different customer segments actually consume your product. I start by analyzing three things: usage patterns, willingness to pay, and risk tolerance.

The analytics SaaS I mentioned earlier? We discovered their customers fell into three clear buckets: consistent daily users (perfect for subscription), seasonal heavy users (needed usage-based), and unpredictable spikers (wanted hybrid protection).

Step 2: Design the Base + Overage Structure

This is where most companies screw up. They either make the base too expensive (scaring away small customers) or too cheap (leaving money on the table from big customers).

The sweet spot I found: set your base subscription to cover 70-80% of your typical customer's usage. This gives them predictability while capturing incremental revenue from higher usage.

For example, if most customers use 1,000 API calls per month, make your base plan 1,000 calls for $50, then charge $0.10 per call above that. Customers can budget for $50, but your biggest users might pay $500.

Step 3: Create Usage Tiers That Make Sense

Don't just slap on linear overage pricing. Create usage tiers that align with customer behavior and business value. The key insight: customers should feel like they're getting a deal when they use more, not being penalized.

I typically recommend a structure like this:

  • Base plan: Covers typical usage at full rate

  • Tier 1 overage (101-300% of base): 80% of base rate

  • Tier 2 overage (301%+ of base): 60% of base rate

Step 4: Build the Right Billing Infrastructure

This is the technical part that most founders underestimate. You need billing systems that can handle both predictable subscriptions and variable usage without creating accounting nightmares.

I learned this the hard way when one client's finance team nearly quit because they couldn't reconcile their revenue. Make sure your billing system can:

  • Track real-time usage against subscription limits

  • Send usage alerts before overage charges kick in

  • Provide clear, detailed invoices that customers can understand

  • Handle mid-cycle plan changes and prorations

Step 5: Communicate Value, Not Just Price

The biggest mistake I see companies make is leading with the complexity of their pricing instead of the value it provides. Customers don't care about your billing model - they care about getting value and managing risk.

Frame it as protection and opportunity: "Pay predictably for your baseline needs, with the flexibility to scale up when your business grows." That's a value proposition, not a billing headache.

Pricing Transparency

Always show customers their usage and upcoming charges. Hidden bills kill trust faster than any competitor.

Customer Segmentation

Different customer types need different billing approaches. Map your segments before designing your model.

Implementation Timeline

Roll out hybrid billing gradually. Start with new customers, then migrate existing ones with grandfathering options.

Revenue Optimization

Use usage data to identify upsell opportunities and optimize your base subscription levels quarterly.

The results speak for themselves, though I wish I could share specific client metrics (NDAs are a pain). But here's what consistently happened when we implemented hybrid billing correctly:

Revenue improvements were significant across the board. The companies that made this switch typically saw 25-40% revenue increases within six months. More importantly, they saw better customer satisfaction scores because customers felt like they had control over their costs.

The analytics SaaS I worked with went from flat revenue growth to 15% month-over-month growth after implementing this model. Their churn actually decreased because small customers felt safer with predictable base pricing, while large customers loved the scaling options.

Customer behavior changed in unexpected ways. When customers knew they could scale usage without massive cost jumps, they actually used the product more. It removed the psychological barrier of "what if I go over my limit."

One of the most interesting outcomes: enterprise customers started viewing these SaaS tools as variable cost centers instead of fixed expenses. This made budget approval easier because they could start small and scale with results.

The implementation timeline was consistently 3-4 months from decision to full rollout. The technical work took longer than expected (it always does), but the business impact was immediate once it went live.

The compound effect was the real win. Companies with hybrid billing models reported that their customers stayed longer, expanded usage more frequently, and referred more often. It became a competitive advantage, not just a billing optimization.

Learnings

What I've learned and the mistakes I've made.

Sharing so you don't make them.

After going through this process multiple times, here are the lessons that would have saved me (and my clients) a lot of headaches:

Start with your customer psychology, not your revenue goals. I learned this the hard way when one client optimized for maximum revenue but created a pricing structure that felt predatory. Revenue growth doesn't matter if customers hate your billing.

Grandfathering is your friend during transitions. When you change billing models, let existing customers stay on their current plans if they want. The goodwill you build is worth more than the short-term revenue optimization.

Usage alerts are not optional. Customers need to know when they're approaching overage charges. Surprise bills kill trust instantly, even if they're technically "fair" based on usage.

Your finance team needs to be involved from day one. Hybrid billing creates complexity in revenue recognition, forecasting, and reporting. Loop them in early or prepare for accounting nightmares.

The most successful implementations were gradual. Companies that tried to switch everything overnight usually created chaos. Start with new customers, test the model, then migrate existing customers slowly.

This approach works best when usage patterns vary significantly among customers. If all your customers use roughly the same amount, stick with simple subscription pricing. Hybrid billing solves the problem of usage variance, not pricing optimization in general.

Avoid it if you can't handle the operational complexity. Hybrid billing requires better customer success, more sophisticated billing systems, and clearer communication. Don't do this if you're not ready to invest in the operational infrastructure.

How you can adapt this to your Business

My playbook, condensed for your use case.

For your SaaS / Startup

For SaaS companies considering hybrid billing:

  • Analyze your usage data to identify clear customer segments with different consumption patterns

  • Start with a simple base + overage model before adding complexity

  • Invest in billing infrastructure that provides real-time usage visibility

  • Test with new customers before migrating existing subscribers

For your Ecommerce store

For ecommerce businesses exploring subscription elements:

  • Consider membership models with usage-based perks (free shipping, discounts)

  • Implement tiered loyalty programs that combine fixed benefits with usage rewards

  • Test hybrid models for B2B ecommerce where purchase volume varies significantly

  • Use subscription base for predictable products, usage for variable inventory

Get more playbooks like this one in my weekly newsletter