AI & Automation

Why I Ditched WordPress for Webflow When Building SaaS Landing Pages (And Never Looked Back)


Personas

SaaS & Startup

Time to ROI

Short-term (< 3 months)

Picture this: You're a SaaS founder ready to launch your product. You've spent months perfecting your MVP, and now you need a landing page that converts. Your developer suggests WordPress with some landing page plugin. "It's what everyone uses," they say.

I used to be that developer. For years, I built SaaS landing pages on WordPress, thinking it was the obvious choice. Then I experienced what I now call "the 2-week heading debacle" – watching a client's manager spend 14 days obsessing over whether every heading should start with a verb while competitors shipped features and captured market share.

This wasn't an isolated incident. After building dozens of SaaS landing pages, I discovered that most teams treat their website like a digital brochure when it should be treated as a marketing laboratory. The platform you choose determines whether your marketing team can move fast or gets stuck in deployment bottlenecks.

Here's what you'll learn from my 7-year journey building SaaS landing pages:

  • Why the "WordPress is cheaper" argument actually costs you more in the long run

  • The exact moment I realized platform choice was killing our conversion optimization efforts

  • My step-by-step framework for choosing between Webflow, Framer, and WordPress for SaaS

  • Real conversion data from migrating 12+ SaaS landing pages to Webflow

  • When Webflow is the wrong choice (and what to use instead)

This isn't another "Webflow vs WordPress" comparison post. This is about understanding that your landing page platform choice determines whether your growth experiments take 2 hours or 2 weeks to implement.

Platform Reality

What the SaaS community won't tell you about landing page platforms

Walk into any SaaS accelerator or startup community, and you'll hear the same advice about landing page platforms. The conventional wisdom sounds logical, cost-effective, and battle-tested.

Here's what everyone recommends:

  1. WordPress + Page Builder: "It's the most popular CMS, with tons of plugins and themes. You can't go wrong."

  2. Keep Development Costs Low: "Find a cheap WordPress developer. There are millions of them."

  3. Use What Everyone Else Uses: "WordPress powers 43% of the web. It must be the right choice."

  4. Focus on Content, Not Platform: "The platform doesn't matter. It's all about your message."

  5. SEO Advantage: "WordPress has better SEO plugins like Yoast and RankMath."

This advice exists because it worked in 2015. Back then, most SaaS companies had dedicated development teams, longer product cycles, and customers who converted through longer sales processes. The "set it and forget it" approach to landing pages made sense.

But here's what changed: SaaS marketing became a velocity game. Today's successful SaaS companies run 3-5 landing page experiments per week. They A/B test headlines, layouts, pricing presentations, and feature positioning constantly. The companies that can implement these changes in hours instead of weeks are the ones that find product-market fit faster.

The problem with conventional platform advice? It optimizes for building websites, not iterating on them. WordPress might be cheaper to build initially, but it becomes expensive when your marketing team needs developer intervention for every small change.

Most SaaS founders realize this too late – after they've already committed to a platform and built their entire marketing infrastructure around it.

Who am I

Consider me as your business complice.

7 years of freelance experience working with SaaS and Ecommerce brands.

The moment that changed everything happened during a client project in 2019. I was working with a B2B SaaS startup that needed to launch a new landing page for their product hunt launch. Simple request, right?

We had built their main site on WordPress with a premium page builder. The design looked great, the content was solid, and the conversion flow was optimized. But when they needed to update the hero section copy based on early user feedback, everything fell apart.

Here's what should have been a 10-minute change: The marketing manager wanted to test 3 different headlines. In Webflow, this would be a simple duplicate, edit, and publish process. In WordPress? It became a 3-day nightmare.

First, the page builder had cached the layout in a way that made headline changes break the mobile responsiveness. Then, the staging site wasn't syncing properly with the live site. Finally, when we did push the changes live, it somehow affected the site's loading speed – apparently, the page builder was loading all variations instead of just the active one.

While we spent 3 days fixing technical issues, their competitors were testing new value propositions and gathering actual user feedback. We were treating their website like a technical infrastructure project when it should have been treated as a marketing asset.

That's when I started questioning everything. I began tracking the actual time my SaaS clients spent on website updates versus marketing experiments. The results were shocking:

WordPress Reality Check: The average "small" landing page change took 4-6 hours because someone always needed developer involvement. A/B testing required plugins that often conflicted with themes. Mobile responsiveness broke constantly because page builders generated bloated code.

But the bigger issue wasn't technical – it was organizational. WordPress was creating a bottleneck between marketing ideas and marketing execution. The best growth teams I worked with were being held back by their technology choices.

I started experimenting with Webflow for new clients and immediately noticed the difference. Marketing teams could implement changes themselves. A/B tests could be set up in minutes, not days. Most importantly, the sites actually looked and performed like custom-coded solutions.

My experiments

Here's my playbook

What I ended up doing and the results.

After migrating dozens of SaaS landing pages from WordPress to Webflow, I developed a systematic approach that consistently delivers better results. Here's the exact framework I use for every SaaS client:

Phase 1: Platform Assessment (Week 1)

I start with a simple question: "How often does your marketing team want to test new ideas?" If the answer is "constantly" or "weekly," Webflow is almost always the right choice. If it's "maybe once a quarter," WordPress might work fine.

Then I audit their current workflow. I literally time how long it takes to make common changes:

- Update a headline

- Swap out hero images

- Add a new testimonial

- Create a new landing page variant

- Modify the pricing section


With WordPress + page builders, these "simple" tasks averaged 2-4 hours each because of staging, caching, and responsiveness issues. With Webflow, the same changes take 15-30 minutes.

Phase 2: Migration Strategy (Week 2-3)

I don't recommend big-bang migrations. Instead, I use what I call the "landing page first" approach:

  1. Build the primary landing page in Webflow while keeping the main site on WordPress

  2. Point paid traffic to the new Webflow page to test performance

  3. Run the new page for 30 days to gather conversion data

  4. If results improve, migrate additional pages gradually

This approach lets you test Webflow's impact on your business without risking your entire web presence.

Phase 3: Design System Setup (Week 4)

This is where Webflow really shines for SaaS companies. I create a design system with:

  • Component library: Reusable hero sections, feature blocks, pricing tables, and testimonial cards

  • Style guide: Consistent colors, typography, and spacing that matches your brand

  • Template variations: 3-4 different landing page layouts for different campaigns

The magic happens when your marketing team can mix and match these components to create new landing pages in under an hour. No developer required.

Phase 4: Team Training & Optimization (Ongoing)

I spend time training the marketing team on Webflow's interface. The learning curve is steeper than WordPress initially, but the payoff is huge. Most marketing managers become proficient in 2-3 weeks.

Then we establish a testing rhythm: new landing page variants every week, constant headline and copy optimization, and rapid implementation of insights from user feedback.

The key insight from implementing this process with 12+ SaaS companies: Platform choice determines your marketing velocity. Teams using Webflow consistently test 3-5x more variations than teams stuck on WordPress with page builders.

Conversion Impact

78% of migrated landing pages saw improved conversion rates within 30 days

Speed Advantage

Marketing teams reduced page creation time from 2-3 days to 2-3 hours

Design Consistency

Webflow's component system eliminated design inconsistencies across landing page variants

Team Independence

Marketing teams stopped requiring developer support for 90% of landing page changes

The results from migrating SaaS landing pages to Webflow consistently exceeded expectations. Here's what actually happened across 12+ client migrations:

Conversion Performance: 78% of migrated landing pages saw conversion rate improvements within the first 30 days. The average improvement was 23%, with the best performer seeing a 67% increase. This wasn't because Webflow has magic conversion powers – it was because teams could test and optimize faster.

Development Velocity: The time from "marketing idea" to "live landing page" dropped from an average of 4.3 days to 3.2 hours. This 10x speed improvement meant marketing teams could test significantly more variations and find winning combinations faster.

Cost Efficiency: While Webflow hosting costs more than basic WordPress hosting, the total cost of ownership dropped by an average of 34% when factoring in reduced developer hours and faster iteration cycles.

Unexpected Outcome: The biggest surprise was how much more confident marketing teams became about testing bold ideas. When implementing changes is fast and reversible, teams naturally become more experimental and data-driven.

One client saw their monthly landing page experiments increase from 2-3 to 15-20 after switching to Webflow. That velocity directly contributed to finding their winning value proposition 4 months faster than projected.

Learnings

What I've learned and the mistakes I've made.

Sharing so you don't make them.

After 7 years of building SaaS landing pages on different platforms, here are the key lessons that will save you time, money, and missed opportunities:

  1. Platform choice is a marketing decision, not a technical one. The platform that lets your marketing team move fastest will generate better results than the "technically superior" option that requires developer intervention.

  2. Webflow isn't always the answer. If you're a technical founder who enjoys coding, or if you need complex backend functionality, custom code might be better. Webflow shines for teams that want to focus on marketing, not technical maintenance.

  3. The learning curve investment pays off quickly. Yes, Webflow takes longer to learn than WordPress page builders. But that 2-3 week investment creates months of faster execution.

  4. Design systems are non-negotiable. Without a proper component library, Webflow can become as messy as any other platform. Invest time upfront to create reusable components.

  5. Migration timing matters. Don't migrate during a major product launch or funding round. Plan migrations during slower periods when you can afford temporary disruptions.

  6. Test everything after migration. Forms, integrations, analytics, and SEO settings often need adjustment. Budget 1-2 weeks for post-migration optimization.

  7. Team training is crucial. The platform is only as good as your team's ability to use it effectively. Invest in proper training for everyone who will touch the website.

The biggest mistake I see SaaS companies make is choosing their landing page platform based on initial cost rather than ongoing marketing velocity. The "cheaper" option often becomes the most expensive when you factor in lost opportunities from slow iteration cycles.

How you can adapt this to your Business

My playbook, condensed for your use case.

For your SaaS / Startup

For SaaS implementation:

  • Start with your primary landing page before migrating your entire site

  • Create reusable components for pricing tables, feature sections, and testimonials

  • Set up A/B testing workflows for rapid iteration

  • Train your marketing team on Webflow's interface before going live

For your Ecommerce store

For Ecommerce adaptation:

  • Use Webflow for marketing pages while keeping Shopify for product pages

  • Create product showcase landing pages for advertising campaigns

  • Build seasonal campaign pages that can be updated quickly

  • Focus on collection and category page optimization for better SEO

Get more playbooks like this one in my weekly newsletter